Showing posts with label psa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label psa. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Veterinary Suicide Awareness funding

We have been asked to help publicize this important message from our colleague Dr. Myers over at justvetdata.com... She is working hard to facilitate this veterinary suicide awareness webinar, and has reached out to AVMA for funding but AVMA as we know is not necessarily the fastest horse out of the gate, and she is working on a deadline!

Last month the North American Veterinary Community (NAVC) held its annual conference in Orlando Florida.  I organized a day long program called Ignite!, designed to present ideas to help us positively engage the profession's most challenging issues. Some of the issues were burnout, suicide, convenience euthanasia, mindfulness and respect.

A veterinary suicide working group formed after the presentation and breakout.  The informal working group has been offered the opportunity of putting on a free suicide awareness and prevention webinar in May courtesy of Justine Lee and VetGirlOnTheRun. The webinar spot is in May- the month in which the most suicides occur.

Each free, RACE approved webinar attracts hundreds of veterinarians, according to Justine Lee of VetGirlOnTheRun.  So in addition to presenting truly life saving information to a large number of vets at a critical time, we could ask how many vets are personally affected by this issue. We can use that info to get more money and support for dealing with suicide and depression in the veterinary profession.

We would like to pursue RACE approval for the webinar.  The group has assembled suitable content and presenters, but we need funding of $240 for the RACE accreditation fee

I've emailed AVMA for the funding at the suggestion of incoming AVMA president Ted Cohn.  Ted was kind enough to moderate part of the Ignite! session for me.  He has been personally affected by the suicide of a colleague, and is thus following the working group's progress and looking for ways to enable the AVMA to support efforts to address this issue.

But - we need to submit for RACE approval by Mar 1, and I don't know that AVMA will be able to respond in that time frame.  So, I'd like to ask people to send money so we can fund RACE approval for this webinar.  I would ask each of you to send $1. Symbolic that any one can help no matter how little you have to give, and symbolic that it takes everyone giving something to get the job done. 

Any funds over the $240 will be directed toward the working group's further efforts, which I'm happy to talk about in additional emails.  Send money using Paypal to vsworkinggroup@gmail.com (free to friends from your bank account or paypal balance).

We here at VBB Central are hopeful that with increased awareness and colleague-to-colleague support, we can nip this problem in the bud before it gets worse. It's all about relationships. Reach out to a colleague in need. Talk to a difficult client like you'd talk to a friend. Try to change people's perception one person at a time! And also, please, donate to help make this webinar a reality!

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Playing Doctor

It was a lovely sunny day at the VBB hospital. The trees were getting some new green as the spring rolled in and there was the slight scent of wet earth that remained from an early morning shower. My day was ticking by, surgery in the morning, followed by afternoon appointments, when suddenly a gaunt figure in a large flowered hat careened into the front lobby.
By large flowered hat, I mean it was a hat with HUGE fuzzy flowers on it, worn by the famous "hat lady" in our little town in recognition of the first official day of spring. This particular lady had hats for all sorts of occasions, all worn as a partial jest and partial personality tic of the wearer.

On this day, the normally sunny countenance of Hat Lady was marred by a look of horror. She was holding an equally flowered handkerchief wound around her wrist. As I walked into the reception area, I could hear her demanding to know the rabies vaccination status of one of our patients. I explained that we were not allowed to release that information to her since she was the owner. However, after looking at the record and seeing that the patient, Teeth, had his last rabies vaccination within the year, I felt pretty comfortable telling her that I didn't think she had anything to worry about with regards to rabies. I advised her to go to the doctor to have the wound looked at and maybe a tetanus shot.

It was at this point that the Hat Lady started yelling that I had to give her a rabies vaccination. I told her that A) I didn't have vaccines for humans and B) I was not licensed to give a vaccine to a human. She kept saying that a rabies vaccine is a rabies vaccine and that she "demanded" that I give her one. When I told her that she would need to talk with her doctor and animal control about that, she got super dooper mad. She threatened to call my boss...I offered to dial the number for her. She threatened to call the board...again, I offered to dial the number for her.

When the police showed up (she had called them about the dog bite), both the officer and I were finally able to get her to calm down. As the dog in question was current on vaccines, he was quarantined for 10 days in the home of his owner and the Hat Lady never required a rabies vaccine (at least not yet).

This brings up some important things: One, a vaccine approved for dogs, cats, goats, cows, horses, etc is not necessarily approved for humans. In fact, I am struggling to think of one off of the top of my head. Two, most vets would rather you call the vet board because they refused to work on you rather than to have a board report for working on you. Hell, the vet at my undergrad even refused to pull a splinter out of the hand of a fellow student because he didn't want to get in trouble for working on a human.

The last thing to let everyone know is that rabies vaccines are important. It is against the law to not have your dogs and cats vaccinated and it is a bad idea to not vaccinate other animals. In the US, there are not large numbers of animals identified as being rabid nor are there large amounts of people dying from rabies. However, in places like China and India, those numbers increase exponentially. We can thank our relatively low rabies incidence to the efforts of the public health departments and veterinarians. That does not mean that we can relax our attitudes towards rabies. We have global travel of animals, including the adoption and importation of animals from places in the middle east, where soldiers are falling for homeless animals and trying to help them. Some of these animals can come to the US with rabies. So, thinking that you can extend the time between rabies vaccines beyond the scope of the vaccine is both illegal and dangerous.

A family in Florida just found this out. Their dog came in contact with a raccoon. The dog had not been vaccinated for rabies within the allotted time. Most rabies vaccines are either considered to be effective for 1 year or for 3 years. This dog had been vaccinated 7 years prior to the incident. Because of the lack of protection from the rabies vaccination and the contact with a raccoon, this dog contracted rabies. Rabies is diagnosed post mortem (after death) via a certain test on the brain cells. Once this dog was diagnosed with rabies, the humans in the household had to be vaccinated and the other family dogs were euthanized. In reality, after the unvaccinated dog came into contact with a raccoon, an animal species known to harbor rabies, the dog should have been euthanized or at the very least quarantined for 6 months or so. Rabies viral particles have to travel up the nerves from the site of the bite/contact into the brain, which can take a long time. Thus an animal can be infected, but not start showing signs or being able to transmit rabies for weeks to months, depending on the site of the bite.

As for the 1 year versus 3 year protocol, I am split on this. For animals that are likely to come into contact with wild life regularly, I would stick with the yearly protocol. I have read a report of a dog that contracted rabies in spite of being within the 3 year interval per his rabies vaccine. For those patients that are less likely to see hot wild life action (like my indoor, couch potato old lady dog), I would go with an extended, 3 year protocol. And just because your cat does not go outside, do not assume it is safe. There are enough people that find random bats in the house...and a bat bite often goes unnoticed, even when they bite a human. So, obey the law....and use some common sense. Some of my colleagues might disagree and they are welcome to do that. However, a classmate of mine told me that they just had a dog diagnosed with rabies in Virginia and there was also a recent report of a horse that was diagnosed with rabies in Tennessee.

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Someone seems confused around here

Now, I don't know if it's just me - but, I thought that given our blog title, and the general tenor of our posts thus far, the subject of our blog was pretty clear. I don't know too much about how Google's back-end works with respect to their search algorithms or anything, so maybe that's why this is coming as such a surprise to me, but - well, take a look at these search terms used to find our friendly little blog:

Seriously, people? SERIOUSLY?


Just in case you can't read that last one - some poor misguided soul ended up here after searching for "pissing in vagina." PISSING IN VAGINA! I really do not think that the subject of "pissing in vagina" has been under discussion here at VBB central, so I suppose the poor soul in question left disappointed. I'd like to try to remedy that.

Assuming that the searcher was actually interested in finding out about pissing THROUGH the vagina, rather than some type of sex-play involving pissing IN someone ELSE'S vagina (which, now that I think about it, could totally be what he or she was going for in which case EW, OMG, please pass the brain bleach!), then this person would have been better off googling "female urogenital fistula," or "vesicovaginal fistula." These are real conditions. You may, if you were an Oprah fan like my mom, even have seen an episode of Oprah about poor women in Africa with these problems and gone around for the next six weeks grossing everyone out by bringing up the subject while they were trying to eat.  Anyway, in case our poor searching person comes back here looking for information about it, suffice it to say - sometimes, for a variety of causes including botched surgery, problems with pregnancy/labor/delivery, malnutrition, etc, a tunnel of sorts opens up between the urinary bladder and the vagina (or sometimes the uterus or cervix) resulting in uncontrolled leakage of urine out through the vagina. Affected women are incontinent and often malodorous.

Please see the informative article here: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/267943-overview for additional information on this unfortunate malady.

Thus endeth today's VBB foray into medical problems in the one species we are not licensed to diagnose or treat. Please don't report us to the medical board for practicing without a license. Thanks for stopping by!

Saturday, January 21, 2012

another peeve

"Can we just bring him in, and you can look at him real quick, and then let me know if he needs an exam?"

No. Either make an appointment and come in for the exam, or don't. I am happy to advise over the phone to an extent, eg: one episode of vomiting in an otherwise normal appearing young adult labrador retriever, probably ok to wait before coming in for exam; vomiting q 2 hrs x 48 hrs in a 12 year old cat with a history of FeLV, not ok to wait before coming in for exam. But, you can't come in to have me LOOK AT HIM to decide if you want an exam. Me looking at him = doing an exam.

Just wanted to clear that up due to a disturbing series of phone calls and drop-ins I've handled lately.